← TechCrunch AI
资讯TechCrunch AI· 06-14 · 16:38

AI 公司争相上市,还有谁搭上这趟车?

As AI companies race to go public, who else is along for the ride?

打开原文约 22 分钟读

As AI companies race to go public, who else is along for the ride?

SpaceX went public this week in the largest IPO ever, making CEO Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire.

Despite its name, SpaceX has been emphasizing the potential of its costly AI business, and competitors OpenAI and Anthropic may soon follow with their own public market debuts. So on the latest episode of TechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed what’s looking like a hot IPO summer.

“We have SpaceX not only sucking up just a huge chunk of the money that’s available on public markets, but also really stress testing the limits of what a public company can be and how much it can be controlled by one single person,” Sean said. “My eye is really on these other tech companies that will go public and how much they will try to emulate.”

Kirsten also noted that there are other startups trying to “ride that SpaceX IPO wave,” for example by raising money for orbital data centers after SpaceX helped to popularize the concept.

“So there’s a ripple effect that’s happening throughout the market that I think is probably even more interesting than just the headline, ‘SpaceX makes Elon a trillionaire,’” she said.

Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity.

Anthony Ha: I want to zoom out a little bit from just the SpaceX IPO, because beyond the Elon Musk of it all, it’s the beginning of what could be a [series] of different IPOs for different AI companies. We’ve talked about Anthropic confidentially filing to go public, and now OpenAI has done the same. How excited are either of you about this?

Kirsten Korosec: I want to start off by saying that I love Julie Bort’s story, which I think sums it up pretty nicely. It’s a great headline, so I’m gonna read it here: “It’s not FAANG anymore, it’s MANGOS.” FAANG being Facebook, which is now Meta; Amazon; Apple; Netflix; Google, now Alphabet.

Now it’s shifted, and we’ve got Meta, Anthropic, NVIDIA, Google, OpenAI, SpaceX. [We’ve still got] massive tech companies, surely, but there is a shift here, right? First of all, we’ve got a bunch of AI labs in there, and that’s very different. Netflix gets booted out of there, a giant streaming service. And so to me, it’s an interesting shift in terms of public markets and the vast amount of money and capital available in the public markets shifting away from consumer [and] social networks and towards, specifically, AI labs and other, more innovative deeptech, such as SpaceX.

So I think that’s the most interesting thing — aside from the fact that this summer is going to keep us all very busy as reporters, more than probably any other summer in a while.

Sean O’Kane: You know, once upon a time I wanted to be a lawyer, and one of the reasons I didn’t was because I hated the paperwork that was going to be involved. And here I am looking forward to reading hundreds more pages of SEC filings this summer — talk about a beach read.

It’s a moment we’ve been anticipating for a while. We’ve spent the last few years really wondering if the IPO market was going to quote-unquote “open back up” after a lot of consternation about private markets, and mockery about people reaching their like Series [whatever] fundraising round. This is a good stress test — I mean, “good,” take that word however you want — a good stress test of public markets in general.

We have SpaceX not only sucking up just a huge chunk of the money that’s available on public markets, but also really stress testing the limits of what a public company can be and how much it can be controlled by one single person. My eye is really on these other tech companies that will go public and how much they will try to emulate.

A thing that I keep saying and thinking about with SpaceX is, they’re really trying to take some of the most extreme aspects of Google and Meta’s original IPOs back in the early 2000s and mashing it up with that “We’ll lose money forever” with Amazon. And I’m curious how much Anthropic and OpenAI will try to do the same. Will they remake themselves in the image of SpaceX? Or will they try to put themselves in a different light?

Anthony: One aspect that really got driven home as I was reading about the OpenAI IPO is also the extent to which some of this is also a bit of a race in terms of timing. I think we can confidently say at this point, SpaceX is first out the gate, which probably has some advantages and disadvantages. It’s also a bit of a different company because it’s billing itself as an AI company, but obviously has a bunch of other stuff going on, too.

But there is a sense in which, at least according to some analysts, OpenAI and Anthropic may both want to go before the other one, because there’s only a finite amount of capital, a finite amount of interest. At some point some of these valuations have to start coming back down to Earth, and so they may both be scrambling to be first.

Kirsten: I mean, there’s very much a race between Anthropic and OpenAI. You’re even seeing OpenAI talk about slashing prices, and they’re certainly going to be competing on the IPO calendar. But that is very short-term thinking. If they’re smart, they should be much more concerned about the long-term play here.

To me, what’s really interesting is while Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX all prepare for these moments, there are a host of other companies out there that are raising money on the backs of the success of companies like SpaceX, or going into SPACs. Just today, for instance, or as we’re recording this, a company called Quantum Space is doing a SPAC and absolutely trying to ride that SpaceX IPO wave.

We’ve got a host of other startups that our reporter Tim Ferholz has reported on that are clearly — they’re not going to go public, right? But if SpaceX is successful with space data centers, they’re raising money off of that potential and they’re building businesses on that potential. So there’s a ripple effect that’s happening throughout the market that I think is probably even more interesting than just the headline, “SpaceX makes Elon a trillionaire.”

Sean: The commonly accepted theory in Silicon Valley is that AI is remaking the economy, but because of its use. AI is actually already remaking the economy — just because of how people are trying to build it. We have everything that you just described, we have these other companies rushing to public markets. And I think that’s a really good point to think about: Will they ever regret rushing to public markets?

But we even have companies like Ford and General Motors who are pivoting their unused battery creation capacity to be energy providers for data centers. And Ford’s stock shot up when it announced what is honestly a pretty modest-looking energy storage business, in comparison to something like Tesla. And Tim De Chant had a really great series of stories this week about GM’s pivot, as well.

The economy’s already being remade. Whether that’s durable, again, that’s the question, but it’s happening right now.

Kirsten: That is actually a really good point, because to me, I want to say five, six, seven, eight years ago, there were all these headlines of “the next Tesla killer” and these automakers and other companies are still chasing trying to recreate all these various businesses, and specifically the strategies of Elon Musk-based businesses. They haven’t learned their lesson.

I wish I could communicate this to all the automaker CEOs out there: I get it that you have a lot of unused batteries and you want to pivot to something else, but trying to model your business after Tesla or SpaceX and others, it doesn’t always work. Perhaps look elsewhere.

Sean: So Ford shouldn’t get into space data centers. Is what you’re saying?

Kirsten: No, they shouldn’t. But just watch. This is going to happen.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Anthony Ha is TechCrunch’s weekend editor. Previously, he worked as a tech reporter at Adweek, a senior editor at VentureBeat, a local government reporter at the Hollister Free Lance, and vice president of content at a VC firm. He lives in New York City.

The FBI built its own replica small town to simulate real-world cyberattacks

Jeff Bezos’s Prometheus raises $12B to build an ‘artificial general engineer’ for the physical world

Cybersecurity researchers aren’t happy about the guardrails on Anthropic’s Fable

Google just fired a warning shot in the AI subscription price wars

WWDC 2026: Everything announced on Siri AI, iOS 27, Apple Intelligence, and more

Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 is a version of Mythos the public can access today

It’s not FAANG anymore. It’s MANGOS.

本周,SpaceX 完成了史上最大规模的 IPO 上市,让 CEO 埃隆·马斯克成为全球首位万亿富翁。

尽管名字里带着"Space",SpaceX 一直在强调其烧钱的 AI 业务的潜力,而竞争对手 OpenAI 和 Anthropic 可能很快也会跟进、登陆公开市场。所以在 TechCrunch《Equity》播客的最新一期里,Kirsten Korosec、Sean O'Kane 和我聊了聊这个看起来会很火热的"IPO 之夏"。

"SpaceX 不只是吸走了公开市场上一大块可投资金,还在真刀真枪地测试一家上市公司的边界能到哪里、能在多大程度上被一个人掌控,"Sean 说,"我真正盯着的,是接下来要上市的那些科技公司,以及它们会在多大程度上去模仿。"

Kirsten 也指出,还有别的创业公司想"搭上 SpaceX 这波 IPO 浪潮",比如在 SpaceX 把"轨道数据中心"这个概念带火之后,有人就借势为它融资。

"所以市场上正在产生一种涟漪效应,我觉得这可能比'SpaceX 让马斯克成为万亿富翁'这个头条本身更有意思,"她说。

下面是我们对话的节选预览,为篇幅和清晰度做了编辑。

Anthony Ha: 我想把视角从 SpaceX 这一桩 IPO 稍微拉远一点。因为抛开马斯克这个人本身不谈,这可能是一连串不同 AI 公司 IPO 的开端。我们之前聊过 Anthropic 已秘密递交上市申请,现在 OpenAI 也这么做了。你们俩对此有多兴奋?

Kirsten Korosec: 我想先说,我特别喜欢 Julie Bort 那篇报道,我觉得它总结得相当到位。标题很棒,我念一下:"不再是 FAANG,而是 MANGOS 了。" FAANG 指 Facebook(现在叫 Meta)、Amazon、Apple、Netflix、Google(现在叫 Alphabet)。

现在格局变了,我们有了 Meta、Anthropic、NVIDIA、Google、OpenAI、SpaceX。它们当然仍是体量巨大的科技公司,但这里确实有个转变,对吧?首先,里面多了一堆 AI 实验室,这非常不一样。而 Netflix——一个流媒体巨头——被踢了出去。所以对我来说,这是公开市场上一个很有意思的转向:海量的资金和资本正从消费类、社交网络,转向 AI 实验室,以及像 SpaceX 这样更具创新性的深科技。

所以我觉得这是最有意思的地方——当然,除了这个夏天会让我们这些记者忙得不可开交、可能比近年任何一个夏天都忙之外。

Sean O'Kane: 你知道吗,我曾经想当律师,而我最终没去的原因之一,就是讨厌那一堆要做的文书工作。结果现在,我正盼着这个夏天再去读几百页的 SEC 招股文件——真是绝佳的"海滩读物"。

这是我们期待已久的时刻。过去几年我们一直在琢磨:在私募市场引发那么多焦虑、在大家对动辄融到"Series 多少多少轮"的调侃声中,IPO 市场到底会不会"重新打开"。这是一次很好的压力测试——我说"好",你怎么理解都行——对整个公开市场的一次很好的压力测试。

SpaceX 不只是吸走了公开市场上一大块可投资金,还在真刀真枪地测试一家上市公司的边界能到哪里、能在多大程度上被一个人掌控。我真正盯着的,是接下来要上市的那些科技公司,以及它们会在多大程度上去模仿。

关于 SpaceX,我反复在说、也一直在想的一点是:他们其实是想把 Google 和 Meta 在 2000 年代初 IPO 时一些最极端的做法,跟亚马逊那套"我们会永远亏钱"揉到一起。我很好奇 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 会在多大程度上照搬。它们会把自己重塑成 SpaceX 的样子,还是会试着呈现出另一种面貌?

Anthony: 我在读 OpenAI 上市相关报道时,真正意识到的一点是:这在某种程度上也是一场关于时机的竞速。我想我们现在可以很有把握地说,SpaceX 是第一个冲出闸门的,这大概有利也有弊。它也算是家不太一样的公司,因为它把自己标榜为一家 AI 公司,但显然手里还有一大堆别的业务。

但至少照一些分析师的说法,OpenAI 和 Anthropic 可能都想抢在对方前面,因为可投的资本是有限的,市场的兴趣也是有限的。到某个时点,这些估值总得开始回落到地面上,所以它们俩可能都在争当第一。

Kirsten: 我是说,Anthropic 和 OpenAI 之间确实有一场竞赛。你甚至能看到 OpenAI 在谈大幅降价,它们在 IPO 时间表上肯定也会较劲。但那是非常短视的想法。如果它们够聪明,更该操心的是这里的长期博弈。

对我来说,真正有意思的是:在 Anthropic、OpenAI 和 SpaceX 都为这些时刻做准备的同时,外面还有一大批公司正借着 SpaceX 这类公司的成功来融资,或者去做 SPAC(借壳上市)。比如就在今天、就在我们录这期节目的时候,一家叫 Quantum Space 的公司正在做 SPAC,铁了心要搭上 SpaceX 这波 IPO 浪潮。

我们的记者 Tim Ferholz 报道过的另一批创业公司也很明显——它们不会上市,对吧?但如果 SpaceX 在太空数据中心上做成了,它们就靠着这种可能性融资、靠着这种可能性建立业务。所以市场上正发生一种涟漪效应,我觉得它可能比"SpaceX 让马斯克成为万亿富翁"这个头条更有意思。

Sean: 硅谷普遍接受的说法是,AI 正在重塑经济——但那是因为它被使用。而实际上,仅仅因为人们在抢着把它建出来,AI 就已经在重塑经济了。你刚描述的这一切都在发生:这些公司争相奔向公开市场。我觉得有一个很值得想的问题:它们将来会不会后悔急着上市?

但我们甚至还看到像福特和通用这样的公司,正把闲置的电池产能转去给数据中心当能源供应商。福特宣布那项坦白说相当不起眼(跟特斯拉那种比起来)的储能业务时,股价还涨了。Tim De Chant 这周关于通用转型也写了一组非常精彩的报道。

经济已经在被重塑了。这是否可持续,还是那句话,是个问号,但它正在此刻发生。

Kirsten: 这其实是个很好的点。因为对我来说——我想说是五、六、七、八年前吧——当时满屏都是"下一个特斯拉杀手"的头条,而这些车企和别的公司至今仍在追着想复制各种业务,尤其是马斯克系公司的那套打法。它们没吸取教训。

我真希望能把这话传达给所有车企 CEO:我懂,你们手里有一大堆闲置电池、想转去做点别的,但想照着特斯拉、SpaceX 这些公司来给自己的业务建模,并不总管用。也许该往别处看看。

Sean: 所以你的意思是,福特不该去搞太空数据中心?

Kirsten: 对,不该。但你就看着吧,这事一定会发生。